CPU-processor
#21
Posted 28 May 2005 - 10:17 PM
#22
Posted 29 May 2005 - 01:11 PM
#23
Posted 29 May 2005 - 04:09 PM
He means the 3800+ (2.4GHz). There is no AMD processor above 2.6GHz (the FX-55).
#24
Posted 29 May 2005 - 05:55 PM
#25
Posted 29 May 2005 - 07:07 PM
Anyway, charalambos, that fits with what i have be reading about the new pentiums, and its that kind of screwing around that has made me switch from Intel to AMD
#26
Posted 30 May 2005 - 03:48 AM
#27
Posted 30 May 2005 - 08:51 AM
#28
Posted 30 May 2005 - 04:59 PM
What about this proccessor?
#29
Posted 30 May 2005 - 09:44 PM
#30
Posted 31 May 2005 - 06:12 AM
Intel currently offers two types of 64 bits processors, one is EM64T, one is EE version (which has extra cache).
Intel will only issue 32 bits dual cores and 64 bits single core later, whilst AMD's ones are 64 bits for both.
Am I right?
Edited by MaLing, 31 May 2005 - 06:20 AM.
#31
Posted 31 May 2005 - 01:13 PM
#32
Posted 31 May 2005 - 05:20 PM
#33
Posted 31 May 2005 - 05:47 PM
#34
Posted 31 May 2005 - 05:55 PM
@Skylineboy
I think that is the main difference between the PentiumEE and a Pentium 4 proccessor, if it is what you mean when reffering to "the simple one". PentiumEE is, as the AMD64, a 64bit working and 32 bit combatible single core proccessor( whereas the Itanium one is not 32bit combatible and the dual core Pentium D has it's in-built problems- and no L2 cache also if I remember wright), that's why it is so expensive.
#35
Posted 01 June 2005 - 12:49 AM
#36
Posted 01 June 2005 - 08:26 AM
Intel
---------
Pentium 4 (Standard) : 64 bits-EM64T, 32 bits compatible, standard cache, single core
Pentium D : no 64 bits, 32 bits, standard cache, dual cores
Pentium EE : 64 bits-EM64T, 32 bits compatible, extra cache, single core
Pentium Itanic : 64 bits-True, no 32 bits, standard cache, single core
AMD
-------
AMD64 : 64 bits-True, 32 bits compatible, standard cache, single core
AMD Sempron : no 64 bits, 32 bits, standard cache, single core
Coming AMD64 (Dual cores) : 64 bits-True, 32 bits compatible, standard cache, dual cores
So complicated. If a person goes to a shop and looks for a processor without all these ideas in his mind first, what will the story be?
Skylineboy, at first you said you wanted to keep your socket 478 and to only change your Intel processor, but now after instigated by us, you want to change your whole system to AMD. I hope we are not devils to you.
#37
Posted 01 June 2005 - 03:18 PM
#38
Posted 01 June 2005 - 05:45 PM
Correction: 32 bits, no 64 bits, extra cache, single core
#39
Posted 01 June 2005 - 06:54 PM
I take offense to that. I actually like being called a devil...
#40
Posted 01 June 2005 - 09:06 PM
JK, I love y'all. Well most of yous anyways.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users