how many posts i need for a 120% member?
Forum Ranking
Started by
Moonie
, Jul 15 2008 01:51 AM
19 replies to this topic
#2
shawn_nee
-
- Alcohol Beta Tester
-
- 3,085 posts
120% Member
Posted 15 July 2008 - 07:18 AM
QUOTE (Moonie @ Jul 15 2008, 03:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
how many posts i need for a 120% member?
Quite a bit more.
#3
Moonie
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,011 posts
120% Member
Posted 15 July 2008 - 08:27 AM
QUOTE (shawn_nee @ Jul 15 2008, 03:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (Moonie @ Jul 15 2008, 03:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
how many posts i need for a 120% member?
Quite a bit more.
With BIT you mean more then 500 right
#5
Moonie
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,011 posts
120% Member
Posted 15 July 2008 - 12:50 PM
QUOTE (Iluro80 @ Jul 15 2008, 05:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Who knows.... 
not very nice
Edited by Moonie, 15 July 2008 - 01:11 PM.
#6
zamiel
-
- Administration
-
- 8,841 posts
Forum Support
Posted 16 July 2008 - 03:44 PM
Here are the ranks:
1% Member - 1 Post
10% Member - 10 Posts
52% Member - 52 Posts
68% Member - 100 Posts
100% Member - 250 Posts
120% Member - 500 Posts
1% Member - 1 Post
10% Member - 10 Posts
52% Member - 52 Posts
68% Member - 100 Posts
100% Member - 250 Posts
120% Member - 500 Posts
#7
BigTy
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,565 posts
120% Member
Posted 16 July 2008 - 07:23 PM
AAAAAAA do I remember those days of mad psots 
. I recall being in the top 5 on post counts.
. I recall being in the top 5 on post counts.
#8
Moonie
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,011 posts
120% Member
Posted 17 July 2008 - 01:06 AM
QUOTE (zamiel @ Jul 17 2008, 12:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
120% Member - 500 Posts
oops i think i need some more posts
@BigTy
no fear
i don't spam the topics
or is this spam ?
#9
shawn_nee
-
- Alcohol Beta Tester
-
- 3,085 posts
120% Member
Posted 20 July 2008 - 02:04 PM
Ty, your only at 14 right now. It wouldnt take you too much to get you back in the top 10...
#10
BigTy
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,565 posts
120% Member
Posted 21 July 2008 - 11:15 AM
Dude
There is no way I would even want to get into the top 10. Also at the rate of posts in teh forums I would be posting more crap than good even is I tried.
There is no way I would even want to get into the top 10. Also at the rate of posts in teh forums I would be posting more crap than good even is I tried
.
#11
NARS
-
- Administration
-
- 2,819 posts
Forum Administration
Posted 21 July 2008 - 01:48 PM
Do you remember something like this:
#12
BigTy
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,565 posts
120% Member
Posted 21 July 2008 - 02:00 PM
NARS lives!!! Yeah I recall it dont hate becuase I gave up the crown .
.
#13
shawn_nee
-
- Alcohol Beta Tester
-
- 3,085 posts
120% Member
Posted 21 July 2008 - 03:10 PM
Nars is just mad I passed him up....
#14
NARS
-
- Administration
-
- 2,819 posts
Forum Administration
Posted 21 July 2008 - 03:18 PM
I'm not on the race for top spammer
#15
Moonie
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,011 posts
120% Member
Posted 21 July 2008 - 03:24 PM
QUOTE (NARS @ Jul 21 2008, 11:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm not on the race for top spammer
the top spammer is zamiel!
oooops i say nothing
here the ranking
1. ZAMIEL 8125
2. ROBBO 6238
3. PHOENIX 6024
#16
Phoenix
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 6,524 posts
120% Member
Posted 29 July 2008 - 05:57 AM
was actualy contenplating setting everyones post count back to 0 so as to give newer members 
a chance to shine and not have it calculated on those who have been here since as far back as 2002
#17
BigTy
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,565 posts
120% Member
Posted 29 July 2008 - 04:16 PM
uummm yyyeaaahhhhhh, lets hope that thought did go anywhere 
.
.
#18
Jito463
-
- Support Team
-
- 5,625 posts
Forum Support
Posted 29 July 2008 - 05:36 PM
Better yet, set Ty's so that every time he posts, it subtracts from his post count.
#19
BigTy
-
- +Alcohol-Customer
-
- 1,565 posts
120% Member
Posted 30 July 2008 - 05:01 PM
Posts: 5458 <--- you have no room to talk sir
#20
Jito463
-
- Support Team
-
- 5,625 posts
Forum Support
Posted 31 July 2008 - 06:15 PM
Actually, I've got plenty of room to talk. It's quite spacious where I'm at, and...oh, is that not what you meant?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
