starforce 3.X
#1
Posted 25 June 2004 - 06:23 PM
what is about starforce protection 3.x? Is it technical possible?
thx
#2
Posted 26 June 2004 - 01:39 AM
#3
Posted 18 July 2004 - 09:45 PM
When will be possible, starforce 3.x to be copied on some hardware (burners)?
#4
Posted 19 July 2004 - 05:48 AM
#5
Posted 19 July 2004 - 06:54 AM
And 1 or 2 hardware-combis is possible and faster to make it compatible with alcohol. concentrate on some hardware not on all.
Edited by Profi, 19 July 2004 - 06:55 AM.
#6
Posted 19 July 2004 - 09:57 AM
#7
Posted 19 July 2004 - 12:01 PM
Then the alcohol-team can delete the predefined profiles for all starforce and securom 5.x. This profiles can actually only burn a few customers (maybe 5%). Thats the point of my question. You make predefined profiles for this protections, but only few customers can use this. Why not specified for some hardware-combos. Thats the solution. Many people would buy this hardware-combos, when you say this combo is okay for this protection or another for another protection.
Think about that.
With your answer, new copyprotection (how starforce 3.x and safedisc 3.2x, securom 5.x) will be not copyable in near future with this large hardware-offers on the world. Only specified burners/readers would be working in conjunction with updating burning-software at this present.
Badly, i thought, Alcohol updates their products for new copyprotections in normal periods (1-2 months) also when not yet compatible with all burners/readers on the world.
#8
Posted 19 July 2004 - 12:47 PM
#9
Posted 19 July 2004 - 01:53 PM
#10
Posted 19 July 2004 - 03:28 PM
okay. Would be nice, when starforce can be emulated with any software. But when? next month? next year? blacklisted by copy-protector are very slow. alcohol can do faster this fix as copy-protector can refused.
eg. 20 games are released with starforce 3.3x (blacklist actual alcoholversion), you can now release a new emulationversion and fix this 20 games in this moment. Where are the problem for so slowly reaction from alcohol about emulations?
Please do something and help us with this starforce-problem. thx.
Edited by Profi, 19 July 2004 - 03:34 PM.
#11
Posted 20 July 2004 - 07:31 PM
I wish all you guys at Alcohol luck with bypassing this ######.
Best Wishes
David aka Painkiller
#12
Posted 04 August 2004 - 04:16 PM
Does someone know how SF 3.3x recognize virtual drives ?
I suppose it's more than a simple blacklist.
#13
Posted 05 August 2004 - 06:41 AM
Does someone know how SF 3.3x recognize virtual drives ?
I suppose it's more than a simple blacklist.
Yes, that version at the moment recognises Virtual Drives. It is being worked on.
#14
Posted 05 August 2004 - 10:13 AM
Does someone know how SF 3.3x recognize virtual drives ?
I suppose it's more than a simple blacklist.
Yes, that version at the moment recognises Virtual Drives. It is being worked on.
Thx for the info.
But do you know how SF3 do recognize them ?
Seems to be an universal technique not depending on files or drivers names.
#15
Posted 05 August 2004 - 05:59 PM
#16
Posted 09 August 2004 - 08:36 PM
Dear creators of Alcohol, create SF3 support please.....
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users