New President
#21
Posted 04 November 2004 - 11:39 AM
#22
Posted 04 November 2004 - 12:17 PM
I think that each country has the right to defend itself. And the attack on those twin towers were really terrible. In fact you can´t find the right words for such a slaugther of civilians There is NO excuse for such things, whoever does it !
On the other way, I think that the americans are behaving like a really messy arrogant nation. Thats what happens when you are by far the strongest nation (from the military point of view) ... History repeats itself...
Fighting people like Hitler or Sadam or Bin Laden or ... is right but you must be very very carefull. You become faster as you thing just like your "enemy". Look at the americans, if you have a different opinion as the official one, your bad (unpatriotic, etc...). This is already the end of democracy because if you must keep your opinion and your right of free expression to yourself because otherwise you ARE the bad guy ... for what have all those earlier generations suffered (sacrified many of their sons) ?
What is democracy in a nation when most of the newspapers and tvstations have the same opinion (and are owned by just two or tree people or holdings/companies) ? How could such a nation have really different opinions ?
And last but not least: all governements love "terrorists" because they all have a excuse, each time (!), to chop another piece of OUR rights and civil liberties. And that is NOT american but worldwide so :no:
OK, thats it, your fault, you should have voted for me and would have been spared this long text
#23
Posted 04 November 2004 - 01:45 PM
Forward 12 years.
George W Bush invades iraq, oh thats ok he's allowed to do things like that. Thousand of innocent people have died in Iraq at the hand of the Americans. Innocent America & British soilders have died in Iraq needlessly. The reason for this invasion? Sadam was developing weapons of mass destruction, what weapons of mass destruction? They've never found any! That was just an excuse.
Lets look at who does have weapons of mass destruction, AMERICA! but thats ok, lets also look at a country that has used weapons of mass destruction, AMERICA again! I suppose thats ok to.
#24
Posted 04 November 2004 - 02:15 PM
#25
Posted 04 November 2004 - 04:06 PM
Pro party hahahahahaha!!!!
Hey one of them got busted down here for underage drinking. The bar owner called the police and she got arrested. Can you imagine going up to her and haveing o go through the secret service to arrest her. I bet that was an awkward scene.
Bush is just playing a reality version or RISK.
#26
Posted 05 November 2004 - 06:30 AM
#27
Posted 05 November 2004 - 08:16 AM
#28
Posted 05 November 2004 - 10:25 AM
As for Terrorism, the Taliban was actually given weapons by the American in the 80's to try to oust the Russian. Your own country supported terroists!
Now as for torturing people, lets talk about Guantanmo Bay! You have people held there with no trial who are being tortured with the appoval of your government. When will you american learn that your government feed you all lies so that you will think they are fantastic. It's pathetic.
#29
Posted 05 November 2004 - 10:52 AM
My opinion has been posted. I know many don't agree with me, but that is the beauty of a free society, you don't have too. That is one of the freedoms we have fought for and continue to fight for. This is my feeling on it, it is not going to change. I will not post again because it will just cause flaming. If this does turn into a flame post I will have to edit and close it, so keep it civil....
#30
Posted 05 November 2004 - 11:01 AM
I am not having a personal go at you mate, maybe some of the words I used in my last post should of been a bit better put. Reading it back it might seem as I was talking to you personally but I wasn't.
I have no beef with you, my problem is with the American administratoin. As you say everyone is entitled to their opinion and obviously ours differs. Hey not a problem.
Perhaps we should end this topic here
#31
Posted 05 November 2004 - 11:43 AM
#32
Posted 05 November 2004 - 02:36 PM
#33
Posted 05 November 2004 - 02:38 PM
Terror:
Violence committed or threatened by a group to intimidate or coerce a population, as for military or political purposes.
Intense, overpowering fear. See Synonyms at fear.
One that instills intense fear: a rabid dog that became the terror of the neighborhood.
The ability to instill intense fear: the terror of jackboots pounding down the street.
That include gangs, mobs, and street thugs. Yet i havent seen one movment on those people and I'm NOT just talking US here. I am one of th emost open minded people when it comes to race but the focus has been on one race here. lets open this thing up if its a war on "Terror". It's a shame when an old lady doesnt want to leave her home in her city becuase its a group of hood rats on the corner "Terror".
As I stated before I agree on the hunt for Bin ladin and anyone connected with that attack but to start wiping out people becuase "Terror" you have those issues in your own backyard. show your own people some support.
#34
Posted 05 November 2004 - 03:46 PM
Maybe our Tron leaves it open so that he may edit or worse close it
#35
Posted 05 November 2004 - 04:25 PM
Well I really think that i don't live in USA and I don't want to go there (so there's no problem with the president) but like many other i think, with Bush, USA and Europe couldn't walk in a closer paths and we're separated for too long.
We've fortunately kicked Aznar
Arr.... srry for my bad Engl, I wish you could understand me well enough.
#36
Posted 05 November 2004 - 04:35 PM
#37
Posted 05 November 2004 - 04:36 PM
I find it very funny/odd/depressing that the man who said he would not rest till the person responsible for the towers is has shifted away from finding him, and has repeatedly stated at public news confrences(sp?) he doesn't care about Bin Laden, nor is concerned with his wherabouts (sp?). We have changed over to go after other countries who possess "weapons of mass destruction" but have yet to go after North Korea, Iran, and a few others whom we know without a doubt possess them , and have detonated them already.
I support our troops and always will.
That's only untill he gets the rule stricken that allows only 2 terms.
#38
Posted 05 November 2004 - 04:40 PM
#39
Posted 05 November 2004 - 04:48 PM
I should say that i'm happy for our troops who left the war ( for those who don't know, Spainsh peoble was/is against this illegal war, and it was an electoral promise of Zapatero, not caused for the terrorist attack in Madrid as it was said in many newspapers/TVNews.
There are a lot of countries that have dictators and/or tyrants but they don't have anything to win (economic/material) finishing with them.
Now the world will be scared again bc the Power of Bush.
#40
Posted 05 November 2004 - 05:05 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users