They kinda got it right
#1
Posted 10 August 2005 - 03:49 PM
Atleast the jury found him guily instead of letting the game take the heat. but Take-Two still has to deal with the civil suit filed.
#2
Posted 10 August 2005 - 04:37 PM
#3
Posted 10 August 2005 - 04:48 PM
I think that says it all. This boy desided to do the GTA stuff in real life... It surely isn't the game that forced him to take that decision but it seems that the countless hours that he spent slaughtering and enjoying the bloodshed while playing it weren't a good influence or inspiration for him at all.
#4
Posted 10 August 2005 - 09:41 PM
If you look really close he actually uses his hand to bust the bricks.
I can say that I have tried throwing veggies at people to make them go away, but it didnt work all the time.
#5
Posted 10 August 2005 - 09:54 PM
If it isnt the good old video Games then its Music, how many times have the likes of Marilyn Manson or Ozzy Osbourne etc etc been blamed for youths going out and hosing down there schools and classmates because they heard messages after playing the album backwards or whatever. Maybe questions should be asked how these people can allways so easily get there hands on the weapons that they use.
#6
Posted 11 August 2005 - 01:41 PM
#7
Posted 11 August 2005 - 04:23 PM
What's going on there in USA guys? Is it true that everybody can have a weapon without any control? Here in Greece to have a weapon you must have a licence, and to obtain it you must explain why you need it( there must be a serious reason e.g. a life threat) and, if I know it right, be examined by a psychiatrist( isn't it really neccessary?). Having or, even more, using a weapon without a licence just sends you to prison! Are we... primitive somehow?
#8
Posted 11 August 2005 - 05:43 PM
#9
Posted 11 August 2005 - 09:15 PM
#10
Posted 11 August 2005 - 10:02 PM
#11
Posted 12 August 2005 - 02:27 AM
#12
Posted 12 August 2005 - 05:12 AM
#13
Posted 12 August 2005 - 02:13 PM
the problem is more that the wrong people get the bloody things and its not only America now the same has happened in the UK and also in Germany in the last few years, one thing that i dont agree with is the ability to go and get yourself a Kalashnikov or M16 as you dont need these sort of things to go hunting or even for target shooting.
Legislation regarding guns needs tightening up i feel where those who wish to have one need to go on a course to learn about guns how to use them and also how to store them when not in use etc etc.
Dont get me wrong im not anti gun but one thing that i learnt when i was in the army regarding guns was safety saftey saftey which is one thing that to a great extent is missing when civilians have/get guns.
#14
Posted 12 August 2005 - 04:34 PM
Why should an individual have a gun without really needing it? For "self deffence"?
Then why does the police exist? Here in Greece, whenever we see on TV that a student shot and killed some of his teachers and schoolmates in his school in the US, we just think: "Oh, well, it happened one more time... and God knows how many more times it will happen." You see, people are the one who kill but they can't kill without a weapon.
#15
Posted 12 August 2005 - 06:54 PM
#16
Posted 12 August 2005 - 07:20 PM
Attached Files
#17
Posted 14 August 2005 - 05:38 PM
Well, with a gun you can kill much more people than with a knife: With a knife you can kill one or two before being disarmed, with a riffle you can kill from distance decads of people including anyone that tries to reach you.
As I wrote:
Then why does the police exist?
Outlaws need weapons to terrorise the other people and to battle with the police, normal citizens need them for what? To battle the outlaws? Any specialist would say that if you are threatened by a gun the best thing you have to do is to just "cooperate"... and the worst to try to use a gun yourself- especially if you are not alone!...
#18
Posted 15 August 2005 - 12:11 AM
#19
Posted 15 August 2005 - 12:48 AM
He also illustrated that just over the border in Canada, they don't have anywhere near amount of violent crimes as they do in the U.S.
In NZ there are a number of violent crimes a year, but very few of them actually involve guns, a samauri sword maybe, but not guns.
Does this mean NZer's are just less "tigger happy" than their U.S counterparts? No, I don't think so, many New Zealand people enjoy hunting. I believe there are a number of reasons:
A. Gun control is tighter here. You have to jump through hoops to get a license.
B. We do not have the right to bare arms.
C. If someone next door has a gun for whatever reason, we as a neighbour don't feel the same way. It's a cascading affect, if everyone has a gun....
D. Our police do not carry guns.
Whilst some may pick holes in the above and who knows, in a few years we may have more incidents of violent crimes involving guns because of these policies/practices, but at the moment...
We can probably agree on one aspect, the penalty for violent crimes is not harsh enough deterent in the first place.
#20
Posted 15 August 2005 - 01:21 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users